Informa helps businesses and professionals in hundreds of ways.

Our international portfolio of live events, world-leading research publications, and innovative digital services provide specialists with the knowledge and connections they need to thrive.

Data Center World Australia
7-9 September, 2026
Melbourne Convention & Exhibition CentreMelbourne, Australia
Can We Really Reduce "Work About the Work?

The initial pitch for virtual assistants in communications platforms seemed pretty straightforward: AI features will let you skip meetings or offload note-taking and follow-up assigning. Eventually, your virtual assistant might even morph into a digital twin that could represent you in meetings.

I shared my own skepticism about digital twins in this space a couple of weeks ago. At the risk of seeming sentimental, I suggested that communications and collaboration are inherently human functions that go much deeper than simply scraping the contents of someone’s past messages in hopes of creating a factory for future utterances.

But it turns out that even the more basic virtual assistants may need more help if they’re to achieve the goal of offloading work. The title of this recent No Jitter article (“Managers’ busywork increases with AI use”) even suggests AI could cost time, rather than saving it, if it’s not part of a more integrated view of the business and its processes.

In the article, Matt Vartabedian cites a report from In Parallel, a firm specializing in systems for AI context, focusing on what the company calls “the work about the work,” or what Matt refers to as the “dark matter of work.” This “dark matter” is the effort that makes the work product possible, but “isn’t visible to key stakeholders,” Andrew Filev, founder and CEO of Wrike, told No Jitter earlier this year.

Managers have always contended with this “dark matter,” but using AI as part of a work process may increase the time consumed to deal with it. As Matt quotes the In Parallel report, “Managers now re-explain context twice: once to colleagues, once to the machine.”

In its report, In Parallel breaks down this “coordination overhead” as follows:

  • 8.1 hours per week of “status meetings”
  • 4.6 hours “re-explaining context to people who already had it”
  • 3.8 hours “hunting for decisions that already exist somewhere”

In Parallel is trying to build systems that help enterprises create the context that would reduce this excess coordination overhead. But I have to wonder if this should be high on an enterprise’s list of goals to accomplish using AI. In Parallel found that AI increases the “coordination burden;” what if the best that improved context can do is reduce this burden back to what it was pre-AI? In other words, can we ever really eliminate “work about the work?” Won’t we always need a significant human-in-the-loop component to make sure that processes are accurate and track the ongoing evolution of the business?




Reimagine Collaboration and Communications with Enterprise Connect

All In on What’s Next

For over 35 years, Enterprise Connect has been the premier event where IT leaders, solution providers, and industry analysts come together to define the future of enterprise communications. As the most trusted conference in the industry, we deliver cutting-edge insights, world-class networking opportunities, and hands-on solutions that drive real business success.

Enterprise Connect is more than an event—it’s an experience that empowers enterprise communications leaders to reimagine the future of work. With elevated content, curated networking, and an engaging atmosphere, it remains the must-attend conference for professionals shaping the industry’s evolution.

Our mission is to equip you with the tools, strategies, and actionable insights needed to address your organization’s unique challenges. With industry transformation in mind, this year’s program introduces fresh new conference tracks, including:

  • Legacy Unleashed: Optimizing Your Communications Backbone
  • Workplace Reimagined: Engineering Tomorrow's Collaboration
  • Tech Disruption Zone: Implementing Without Imploding
  • Achieving Transformation: Architecting Your 3-5 Year Roadmap
  • Future Shock: Communications Tech Beyond the Horizon

Featuring the most comprehensive program of objective content and an expansive vendor-neutral expo hall, Enterprise Connect is your ultimate resource for advancing collaboration, CX, and AV strategies. Join us to stay ahead, connect with industry trailblazers, and lead the transformation of enterprise communications.

Subscribe Today

Related news

Bridging the Gap: 5 Tips for Cross-Functional Collaboration That Enables AI Transformation

Ask ten executives who owns AI at their company, and you’ll get ten different answers. IT says it’s not their call. Legal gets blamed for slowing everything down. HR figures it’s someone else’s department. Meanwhile, teams are buying tools nobody signed off on, duplicating work and hoping it all sorts itself out. Sound familiar?

Lisa Duerre spent the last year studying why that happens. As part of an applied research project for her leadership consulting collective, RLD Group, she studied where AI adoption breaks down inside organizations, and where it works. The findings from RLD Group’s research helped inform a collaboration on the CONVERSATIONS WORTH HAVING®: The Human Accelerator for Artificial Intelligence Quick Start Guide, which is available as a digital download.

Duerre views organizations through what she calls an I–WE–US leadership framework, defined like this:

  • I: individual judgment and accountability

  • WE: workflows and cross-functional coordination

  • US: governance, decision rights and organizational measures

“All three levels are contributing to the breakdown or the alignment, whether people realize it or not,” Duerre says. “AI is amplifying whatever’s already true in your system. The teams that were disconnected before AI showed up are more disconnected now. The ones that talked to each other are moving faster, together.”

If your company is ready to collaborate better with AI tools, Duerre shared the following tips. Take a look.

Form a cross-functional AI committee

Duerre’s background is in HR, and she says most HR leaders assume AI ownership belongs to IT. It doesn’t, at least not exclusively.

“Ownership needs to sit at the system level,” Duerre says. “Each function carries a piece of it, based on what they do, how well they understand that part of the business and how their work depends on everyone else’s. AI is flattening how we work. You can’t just keep it in your own business unit anymore. You have to look all around you.”

For starters, she suggests building a cross-functional AI committee instead of having one department make all the AI decisions. Legal, IT, cybersecurity and HR should be on the committee, Duerre says.

“If you have a C in front of your title, you should be on that committee,” Duerre says. “That’s how I look at it, because it’s a system-level solution.”

During these meetings, Duerre says you’ll find out that some departments are racing ahead with AI and others are holding back.

“Both sides need to name the trade-offs aloud,” Duerre says. “With teams moving too cautiously, you have to talk about the opportunity cost of falling behind. With teams sprinting ahead, you have to ask them what happens if they don’t bring everyone else along with them.”

Figure out how to use AI strategically

Most companies spent the past two years telling employees to use AI with anything, without much strategy behind it. Duerre says that’s starting to catch up with organizations as finance teams scrutinize the cost.

Her rule of thumb: if you can’t articulate the goal and how you’ll measure success, don’t roll it out yet.

“Teams that use AI well have a strategy behind it,” Duerre says. “They’ve kicked the tires on what they’re trying to solve it for. You need to ask yourself, ‘Which business outcome are we trying to improve, and what must be aligned for AI to create measurable value?’”

Here are a few examples of how to use AI strategically:

  • A company could select a workflow that regularly creates delays, redesign it with AI and test the new approach. Then, measure whether it improves time, cost, quality or capacity.

  • Use AI to support early sales outreach and qualification across markets and languages. AI can help a business reach and assess more potential opportunities, while people remain responsible for understanding the customer and building trust.

  • Flag patterns in customer complaints across multiple channels with AI, so leadership can see recurring problems before it shows up in satisfaction scores.

Check-in regularly during an AI rollout

Duerre recommends a minimum weekly check-in during any AI rollout, sometimes daily depending on complexity. But the format matters more than the frequency. Status updates don’t cut it.

“Ask, ‘What are we learning and what are we surprised by?’ That’s a question that helps you with your check-ins, versus, ‘It’s in three products now and we’ve tested six,’” Duerre says. “That doesn't help, because you’re having these meetings to figure out what’s working and why. If you ask more strategic questions, you can move even faster.”

Publish AI guardrails

Employees who don’t know what’s allowed with AI will either freeze or go around the system entirely, Duerre says. She recommends publishing clear, specific guardrails on what’s okay and what’s not. Come up with some real examples, and pair them with an intake process that doesn’t require writing a thesis to get an approval for using it.

"The approval path should be lightweight, not bureaucratic,” Duerre says. “Something like, ‘If you’re going to use AI, here’s the path. And if it needs approval, here’s three or four quick questions for you to answer.’”

Take employee anxiety about AI seriously

“AI is just a tool” is a phrase Duerre hears at nearly every conference she attends, but she doesn’t buy it.

“Saying it’s a tool is underselling what’s happening at companies right now,” Duerre says. “AI is changing how we work. It’s changing how we lead teams.”

Duerre wants leaders to remember that a lot of employees are fearful of AI. Pew Research Center found 52% of U.S. workers are worried about the future impact of AI in the workplace.

Employees who feel AI is being “done to them,” instead of built alongside them are especially anxious, she says.

“Leaders need to recognize that anxiety is contagious,” Duerre says. “As a leader, this is your opportunity to show up as the safe, steady person who is showing what you’re learning with AI. And don’t be afraid to show how you’ve failed using AI, too.”

Duerre asks every executive she works with: “Who am I with AI?” and encourages them to pass this mindset question along to their employees, too.

“AI is now your teammate,” Duerre says. “Phrasing it as, ‘who am I with AI?’ is different than, ‘what’s going to happen to me with AI?’ You really want your team to feel empowered with AI and show them how it can help accelerate their career.”

Put these ideas into action

Rewiring your organization for AI requires more than the right tools. It takes shared language, practical frameworks, and a willingness to keep learning. Here are a few resources to help you take the next step.

  • Enterprise AI Playbook: Practical frameworks and executive discussion questions to help IT, HR, and business leaders align around AI that delivers measurable value.

  • Work-First AI Use Case Assessment: Identify the workflows where AI can have the greatest impact before you invest in new tools.

  • The REWIRED Brief: Get weekly insights, real-world case studies, and practical advice on leading AI transformation.

4 Ways to Get Your Team Ready For Their Future Career

The World Economic Forum states that 39% of the skills your team relies on today will change by 2030. Most organizations have not built a plan to prepare their teams for that shift. At my company, we are still debating how to manage this upcoming shift.